Matt Taibbi

Rank 24 of 47
|
Score 8
8/8/2024, 12:50:33 AM
X
In reply to:
Liam Capone
@GeordieGenius
·
470d
@mtaibbi @wrs_willoughby So you checked with the air marshals service? What was their response?
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
470d
America, 2024: mainstream news ignores major stories. When they instead come out on independent sites, trolls like @wrs_willoughby attack the sources as conspiratorial.

Every name you need to check the story yourself is in there. If you’re skeptical, pick up the phone. I did.
Spil
@wrs_willoughby
·
470d
@mtaibbi Look how far Matt Taibbe has fallen
There was a time when he was considered a journalist
Founded in 2019 by Qanon promoter Tracy Diaz,
UndercoverDC is an extreme right-wing website "Conspiracies, Pseudoscience, Propaganda, Poor Sourcing, False Claims"

http://mediabiasfactcheck.com/un…

The statement 'No comment so far.' is a brief response in an ongoing conversation about the credibility of a news source and the validity of a story involving a public figure. The conversation involves multiple participants discussing the reliability of information and the actions of a journalist. The statement itself does not add substantive content to the discourse but is part of a larger dialogue that addresses public issues such as media bias, journalistic integrity, and government surveillance.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement 'No comment so far.' does not directly cause harm but also does not contribute positively to the discourse.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion as it is neutral and non-informative.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, nor does it engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.