In reply to:
Roof Redneck
@HillbillyPlato
·
470d
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
470d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages substantively with public issues, specifically the use of National Security Letters (NSLs) and the expansion of intelligence and security powers in the United States. The tone is inquisitive and seeks to understand the extent of governmental overreach during the early 2000s.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is inquisitive and seeks to understand a complex issue. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by seeking clarification and more information on a public issue. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by asking for more information and does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to seek information and promote understanding. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.