Reposted by Andrew Yang🧢⬆️🇺🇸
The statement addresses a public issue related to respect for veterans and critiques a public figure's behavior. It emphasizes the importance of respect and gratitude for military service while criticizing another public figure's derogatory comments about veterans. The tone is confrontational but aims to uphold respect for veterans.
- The statement strives to do no harm by advocating for respect towards veterans, but it includes a confrontational tone towards a specific individual, which could be seen as harmful. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the dignity of veterans by acknowledging their service but could be seen as disrespectful towards the individual it criticizes. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy towards veterans by highlighting their service and the need for respect. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of a public figure's behavior but includes a personal attack, which detracts from constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to advocate for the betterment of society by promoting respect for veterans. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.