The statement addresses a public figure's comments about a significant public event, the January 6th Capitol riot, and compares it to a historic event, Martin Luther King Jr.'s speech. This constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues and historical comparisons.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as downplaying the seriousness of the January 6th event by focusing on crowd size rather than the violence that occurred. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it could be seen as disrespectful to the memory of MLK and the significance of his speech. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it seems to focus on self-aggrandizement. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It makes a comparison that could be seen as inflammatory or dismissive of the historical context. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a way that may not be responsible or uphold integrity, given the sensitive nature of the events being compared. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.