In reply to:
The Navigator
@navigatio_b
·
372d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
373d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the potential consequences of voting decisions in the context of a political election. It discusses the perceived dangers of reelecting a specific candidate and the moral implications of voting for a third-party candidate, touching on broader issues of political strategy and integrity.
- The statement strives to do no harm by expressing concern over the potential negative consequences of reelecting a specific candidate, which the author believes to be dangerous. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in personal attacks or derogatory language. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by acknowledging the complexity of the situation and the need to balance principles with practical actions. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by discussing the potential moral implications of voting decisions without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence to contribute to the betterment of society by encouraging thoughtful consideration of voting decisions and their broader implications. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.