Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83
8/8/2024, 10:33:43 PM
X
In reply to:
Rob Forbes
@RobForbesDJ
路
529d
@shotpianist @realjdburn @kevinmccabe33 "What has Elon been wrong about?"
"He predicted zero cases in a pandemic. Does that count?"
"No."

Are you for real? 馃ぃ馃槀
Marco
@shotpianist
路
529d
@RobForbesDJ @realjdburn @kevinmccabe33 @GaryMarcus @parisofprairie No
Rob Forbes
@RobForbesDJ
路
529d
@shotpianist @realjdburn @kevinmccabe33 @GaryMarcus @parisofprairie Again, "no new covid cases by April 2020" is pretty huge. There were 103'000'000 reported cases in the US alone over the pandemic. Does being out by 103 million count?
Marco
@shotpianist
路
529d
@RobForbesDJ @realjdburn @kevinmccabe33 @GaryMarcus @parisofprairie Friend, no one knows the future, Elon Musk included.

When I said "something he is wrong about" I meant something he is wrong - present tense - about, not something he said would happen in 2022 that didn't or vice-versa.
Rob Forbes
@RobForbesDJ
路
529d
@realjdburn @kevinmccabe33 @shotpianist @GaryMarcus @parisofprairie That too. The Boring Co. That credit card verification would end the bots on this app. That comedy was legal again. Autonomous Tesla taxis by 2020. AG smarter than humans by next year - Gary here has a $1m bet on that. Hyperloop... Just off the top of my head.
the phantom callback
@realjdburn
路
529d
@RobForbesDJ @kevinmccabe33 @shotpianist @GaryMarcus @parisofprairie not as relevant, but his mini-sub cave rescue plan was a laughable nonstarter

remember? that one cave-diving expert said as much and in response Elon repeatedly claimed that he was a pedophile

we were also supposed to have full-self driving and mars bases years ago iirc

The statement 'blocking your bot in sympathy' is a response within a larger conversation about Elon Musk's predictions and actions. The tone is dismissive and seems to be a reaction to the ongoing debate, but it does not substantively engage with the public issues being discussed. Instead, it appears to be a personal decision or action in response to the conversation, rather than contributing to the civic dialogue.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm, but its dismissive tone could be seen as unconstructive.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it is more of a personal reaction.聽[-1]