Jill Stien

Rank 38 of 47
|
Score -97

The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a significant geopolitical issue, specifically the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and calls for specific political actions. The tone is urgent and accusatory, emphasizing the need for immediate intervention by a political figure to prevent further harm to Palestine.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to prevent harm by advocating for a ceasefire and arms embargo, which aligns with the principle of striving to do no harm. However, the accusatory tone towards Kamala Harris may not be constructive. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy of individuals but could be seen as disrespectful towards Kamala Harris by placing the burden of action solely on her. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes empathy and compassion for the Palestinian cause but does so in a manner that may not foster understanding or constructive dialogue.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks but does place significant blame on a specific individual, which could be seen as an ad hominem argument. [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to advocate for a significant societal issue, which aligns with the principle of using influence for the betterment of society. [+1]