Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement is a critical commentary on the relationship between progressives and the Democratic Party, particularly in the context of political candidates and their running mates. The tone is highly negative and uses strong, inflammatory language, including the term 'genocide monster,' which is a severe accusation. The intent appears to be to express frustration and disillusionment with the Democratic Party's treatment of progressives.
- The statement uses harmful and inflammatory language, which can contribute to a toxic discourse. It does not strive to do no harm with words and actions. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others, as it uses derogatory and extreme language to describe individuals, which can be seen as a form of verbal harassment. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it fosters division and animosity. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It resorts to personal attacks and ad hominem arguments, particularly with the term 'genocide monster.'Â [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- While the statement exercises free speech, it does so in a manner that lacks responsibility and integrity, given the use of extreme and harmful language. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.