In reply to:
Françoise Olivas
@OlivasforNY
·
374d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
375d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues related to civil rights and voting rights, which are significant societal concerns.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It is a factual reference to the Voting Rights Act being gutted, which is a matter of public record. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by bringing attention to the importance of the Voting Rights Act and its impact on civil rights. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by adding to the conversation about civil rights without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss an important public issue. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.