In reply to:
Chase Holden 🏁
@GarageGuyChase
·
530d
The statement and the accompanying image engage in a discussion about the performance and value of AI technologies from major tech companies, specifically Google and Microsoft. This constitutes public discourse as it addresses a significant public issue related to technology, consumer experience, and corporate performance.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm; it is a critique of a company's performance in AI technology.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of individuals, focusing on corporate performance rather than personal attacks.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement indirectly promotes understanding by highlighting that issues with AI performance are not unique to Google, suggesting a broader industry challenge. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of Google's AI performance without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.