Reposted by Gary Marcus
Ashley Gold
@ashleyrgold
·
531d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with the public issue of AI regulation in political advertisements, referencing actions (or inactions) by various regulatory bodies and states.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It is informative and neutral in tone. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by providing a summary of the current regulatory landscape regarding AI in political ads. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on the issue at hand. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence to inform the public about an important issue, contributing to the betterment of society. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly and with integrity. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.