The statement criticizes the banning of books in Utah and proposes a constructive response by suggesting the formation of book clubs to read banned books. The tone is passionate and advocates for intellectual freedom and community action.
- The statement strives to do no harm by advocating for reading and intellectual freedom, which are generally positive actions. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing on the issue rather than attacking individuals. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding, empathy, and compassion by encouraging people to read and discuss banned books, fostering a culture of open dialogue. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the book banning policy and proposes a positive action (book clubs) rather than personal attacks. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for the betterment of society by promoting intellectual freedom and community engagement. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to encourage reading and discussion of banned books. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.