In reply to:
jonathan
@featherfather
路
407d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
路
407d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of book banning in schools and suggesting a solution to counteract it. The tone is somewhat sarcastic but aims to promote a constructive idea.
- The statement strives to do no harm by proposing a positive action (creating book clubs) rather than attacking individuals.聽[+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in personal attacks or harassment.聽[+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by encouraging the reading and discussion of banned books, which can foster diverse perspectives.聽[+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in constructive dialogue by suggesting an alternative solution rather than merely criticizing the situation.聽[+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence to propose a societal betterment initiative, which is the creation of book clubs for banned books.聽[+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.