The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue, specifically the topic of Ranked Choice Voting (RCV) and electoral reform. The statement references a public figure's support for RCV and encourages building a movement toward this voting method, which is a substantive engagement with a public policy issue.
- The statement does not contain harmful language or actions. It neutrally reports on a public figure's support for a policy change, which aligns with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding and potentially empathy by highlighting a proposed solution to a public issue, which is the broken election system. It encourages constructive action toward a common goal. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on the policy issue and the public figure's support for it, which aligns with the principle of constructive criticism and dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By promoting a movement toward Ranked Choice Voting, the statement uses its influence to advocate for what it perceives as a societal improvement, aligning with the principle of using influence for the betterment of society. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by discussing a public policy issue with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.