Marianne Williamson

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 98
8/9/2024, 3:06:00 PM
X
In reply to:
Tina Olhava
@tshow78
·
407d
@joyAndLov @marwilliamson That's the scary part of federal government overreach. They are becoming dictators with these unelected oligarchs trying to control the ppl.
MF
@joyAndLov
·
407d
@marwilliamson @tshow78 Agree!!

Yet Biden/Harris want to monitor vaccines pushed into your body & take away most of your rights should u refuse. The left is supportive of WEF/WHO control of our ideologies....while they fear Project 2025.

Hopefully for RFKj...otherwise both options T & H r worrisome
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
407d
@tshow78 This isn’t even about healthcare. It’s about freedom. The government at no level should have the right to monitor a woman’s pregnancy. That’s as far from healthcare as you can possibly get. It’s mental and emotional abuse.
Tina Olhava
@tshow78
·
407d
@marwilliamson It's constitutional to leave it to the ppl to decide. If the state is creating issues for women you deal with the state at a local level. No one should want the federal government to oversee their Healthcare. That's not my body my choice. That makes it the government's choice.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
408d
Trump said he would be “willing to leave it up to the States,” knowing full well there are statehouses with efforts already underway to monitor women’s pregnancies.
Jessica Valenti
@JessicaValenti
·
408d
On their way to track your period

The statement 'This was not the federal government doing this. This was in Utah.' is a factual correction in a conversation about government overreach and healthcare monitoring. The tone is neutral and aims to clarify a misunderstanding about the level of government involved in a specific action.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement strives to do no harm by providing a factual correction, which helps to clarify the discussion and prevent misinformation. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    By correcting the misunderstanding, the statement promotes understanding and helps to foster a more informed dialogue. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing a specific point without resorting to personal attacks or inflammatory language. [+1]