The New Republic
@newrepublic
·
532d
The statement and the referenced conversation involve a public figure and a political issue, specifically the support of white supremacists for Donald Trump's campaign. The tone is somewhat sarcastic and critical, and it addresses a significant public concern about the influence of extremist groups in politics.
- The statement does not directly cause harm, but the sarcastic tone could be seen as dismissive or trivializing a serious issue. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does mention a controversial figure and group, which could be seen as provocative.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on criticism. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it is more of a sarcastic remark. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech but could be seen as not using the platform responsibly due to its sarcastic tone. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.