In reply to:
Serafim Batzoglou
@s_batzoglou
·
534d
The statement engages in a public discussion about political figures and their potential impact on future elections, which is a substantive public issue. The tone is sarcastic and critical, and it implies a negative view of a political figure by referring to them as a 'felon' and questioning their commitment to democratic processes.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm; it uses sarcasm and a derogatory term ('felon') which can be harmful. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others and engages in a form of cyberbullying by calling someone a 'felon.' [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is sarcastic and critical. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it uses a personal attack ('felon') rather than addressing the argument substantively. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not use the platform responsibly or with integrity; it resorts to name-calling and sarcasm. [-2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.