In reply to:
Polytope
@Polytope13
·
535d
The statement 'of course it was intentional' is a response to a conversation about a tweet by Lex Fridman, which discusses the political rhetoric surrounding Trump and Harris. The conversation involves public figures and addresses political discourse, making it a part of public discourse. The statement implies that the rhetoric discussed was intentional, which can be seen as a critique or affirmation of the original tweet's intent.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies intent, which could be seen as accusatory. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does imply a negative intent which could affect the dignity of the individuals involved.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more accusatory in nature. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it is a brief assertion without explanation or evidence. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.