Gary Marcus

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 83
8/10/2024, 2:13:56 AM
X
In reply to:
Matt Martin
@BioticHamster
·
536d
@GaryMarcus @DavidHunterTO I agree with you. But I still think the people who nominated the crazy old man who rants about sharks and batteries this year will nominate him again in 4 years. He's not getting picked by old men in a backroom, it's the Maga true believers who vote in primaries.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
536d
@BioticHamster @DavidHunterTO 1. he will be 82, and already is showing signs of a cognitive slowdown
2. by hypothesis he will have lost twice in a row.
Matt Martin
@BioticHamster
·
536d
@GaryMarcus @DavidHunterTO The Republican party is the Maga party. It is Trump's party, 100%. He will run again and they will nominate him.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
536d
@DavidHunterTO America’s not going to want another 82-year-old candidate.
David (No Space for Hate) Hunter
@DavidHunterTO
·
536d
@GaryMarcus Trump should be on the list
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
536d
When Kamala Harris runs for reelection in 2028, who will get the Republican nomination?

The statement 'And people frightened of the above' is part of a larger conversation about the potential future political landscape in the United States, specifically regarding the Republican party and Donald Trump's potential candidacy. This conversation involves public figures and political issues, thus constituting public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it does contribute to a conversation that includes potentially harmful rhetoric about political figures.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement itself does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it is part of a thread that includes derogatory language ('crazy old man'). [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is neutral and does not add to the constructive dialogue.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments directly, but it is part of a thread that includes such behavior.
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly, though it does not add significant value to the discourse. [+1]