Gary Marcus

The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive debate about the ideological positioning of Supreme Court justices, which is a significant public issue. The tone is somewhat confrontational but aims to clarify and correct a perceived misstatement.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but the confrontational tone could be seen as slightly aggressive. Minor violation. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. Adheres to the principle. [+1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Neutral.
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing the content of the previous messages rather than attacking the individuals. Adheres to the principle. [+1]
5. Principle 5:

   I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.

   The statement does not acknowledge or correct any mistakes. Neutral.
6. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to engage in a public issue responsibly. Adheres to the principle. [+1]