Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement 'Absolutely. Concentration of power in tech companies is what we have to fight against if we want to save democracy.' constitutes public discourse as it addresses a significant societal issue: the concentration of power in tech companies and its implications for democracy. The tone is assertive and the intent is to highlight a perceived threat to democratic values.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it is assertive and could be seen as confrontational. It does not use harmful language.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement aims to promote understanding and awareness about the concentration of power in tech companies, which can be seen as an effort to foster empathy and compassion for democratic values. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on the issue rather than individuals. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to raise awareness about a societal issue, which can be seen as an effort to better society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss a public concern. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.