Gary Marcus

The statement engages in a public discourse about the intersection of AI and politics, and the validity of political predictions. It addresses the quality of arguments and predictions made by public figures, and critiques the nature of political commentary in the context of AI expertise.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it does include a dismissive tone ('cringe af') which could be seen as disrespectful.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects privacy but could be seen as undermining the dignity of the person it addresses by calling their tweets 'cringe af'. [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it dismisses the political commentary without engaging in a constructive manner. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive criticism and instead resorts to a personal attack by calling the tweets 'cringe af'. It does not provide a substantive argument or engage in a meaningful dialogue. [-2]