Gary Marcus

Rank 11 of 47
|
Score 83
8/10/2024, 11:41:49 AM
X
In reply to:
Biluzeira
@Biluzeira911
·
537d
@GaryMarcus suit yourself bro. You're kind of the inverse-Yudkowsky in a sense.
Eliezer lets his emotions overcome logic when talking about AI; you do the same regarding politics.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
537d
@Biluzeira911 1. That’s an insult not an argument
2. I think I am doing alright, with my usual mix of data and logic
3. which of these two tweets, my then-contrarian prediction vs skepticism that was then popular has held up better thus far?
Biluzeira
@Biluzeira911
·
537d
@GaryMarcus bro he's gotta a point.
You collected W after W in AI, and saw through deception from 10 miles ahead.
but you political tweets are cringe af
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
537d
Anyone who hasn’t caught that AI has become part of politics and that AI has become infested with politics isn’t paying attention.
Dr Connor
@DrConnor1643
·
537d
@GaryMarcus Gary, this is boring content 😮‍💨 AI >> Politics

The statement by @GaryMarcus constitutes public discourse as it engages in a debate about the intersection of AI and politics, and addresses the quality of arguments and predictions in this context.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement by @GaryMarcus aims to maintain a logical and evidence-based discussion, which aligns with the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. However, the act of muting @Biluzeira911 could be seen as dismissive, potentially stifling open dialogue. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    By muting @Biluzeira911, @GaryMarcus may not fully respect the privacy and dignity of others, as it can be perceived as a form of silencing rather than engaging in constructive dialogue. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on dismissing the other party rather than fostering a mutual understanding. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    While @GaryMarcus does engage in constructive criticism by pointing out the lack of logic and examples in @Biluzeira911's argument, the decision to mute rather than continue the dialogue could be seen as avoiding further constructive engagement.