The statement expresses a political opinion about government intervention, specifically criticizing both left-wing and right-wing 'nanny states' and advocating for shutting down such interventions. The tone is assertive and somewhat confrontational, aiming to rally support for a particular political stance. The link to a website suggests further information or action related to this viewpoint.
- The statement does not directly cause harm with words and actions, but its confrontational tone could potentially incite divisiveness.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, and it respects the privacy and dignity of others. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on rallying opposition. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it is more of a call to action against a perceived issue without addressing specific arguments or engaging with opposing views. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for a political stance, which could be seen as aiming for societal betterment from the perspective of those who agree with it. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech and uses the platform to express a political opinion, though the responsibility and integrity of the message could be debated. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.