Reposted by Rashida Tlaib
The statement and accompanying image address a highly sensitive and controversial issue, namely the conflict between Israel and Palestine. The tone is accusatory and emotional, highlighting perceived hypocrisy in the global response to violence against Palestinians compared to hypothetical violence against other groups. The intent appears to be to draw attention to and criticize what the author perceives as a double standard in international reactions to violence. The content is provocative and aims to evoke a strong emotional response.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm; it uses graphic and inflammatory language that could exacerbate tensions and provoke anger, thus potentially causing harm. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of others; it uses hypothetical and real tragic events in a way that could be seen as exploitative and disrespectful to the victims. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is accusatory and divisive, which can hinder constructive dialogue. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it uses a confrontational tone and does not invite discussion or understanding from those who might disagree. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to highlight an issue of perceived injustice, which can be seen as an attempt to use influence for societal betterment. However, the manner in which it is done is counterproductive to constructive discourse. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.