Marianne Williamson

Rank 11 of 47
|
Score 114
8/10/2024, 5:22:13 PM
X
In reply to:
Bhakti Ware
@Hyper_Health
·
408d
@GrumpOldGuy87 @marwilliamson Maybe she wasn’t fully aware of what was in those books that were removed from curriculum. It wasn’t “book banning,” it was removing porn from children’s school selection. A lot of people are not aware of that due to propagandized nonsense from extreme Left Wing Democrats.
GrumpyOldGuy87
@GrumpOldGuy87
·
408d
@Hyper_Health @marwilliamson I used to respect her but...
She's kinda a dope, she wants porn in schools.
Bhakti Ware
@Hyper_Health
·
408d
@marwilliamson The Pharma-sponsored Democrats are over and over, losing the thread of doing what is best for America. However, as I said, You & RFKJr, give us hope for a higher-frequency future of politics.
(But weirdly, so does JD Vance. He has shown the ability to evolve. He’s said stupid…
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
408d
@Hyper_Health I get what you’re saying. “All-in with propagandized lies,” definitely not (I have the scars to prove it).
Bhakti Ware
@Hyper_Health
·
408d
@marwilliamson 😂not the crystal lady— the powerful woman who spoke truth, not worrying about conforming to a machine or party…you were NEVER some New Age crystal lady. The Bitch for God was immensely inspiring and something spoke through her. I get the feeling sometimes the new version is…
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
408d
@Hyper_Health You think this isn’t the “political version? Or do you mean the doppleganger crystal lady bs?

The statement addresses the issue of book banning in schools, specifically in relation to the inclusion of certain books in the curriculum. It engages in a public debate about censorship, educational content, and the appropriateness of certain materials for different age groups. The tone is critical and aims to challenge the notion that certain books are equivalent to pornography, suggesting that the current approach to book banning is excessive.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It critiques the idea of book banning without resorting to harmful language or actions. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by arguing against the excessive banning of books and suggesting a more nuanced approach to what is appropriate for different age groups. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing the issue of book banning and providing a counter-argument. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech by defending the inclusion of certain books in the curriculum and using the platform responsibly to discuss a public issue. [+1]