In reply to:
Steven Marlow
@sd_marlow
·
537d
The statement 'Indeed, they are only open-source if they are OPEN-source.' is a response in a chain of discussions about the nature of open-source models and their accessibility, which ties into broader debates about AI research, industry practices, and legislation. This constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues related to technology, research accessibility, and policy implications.
- The statement does not cause harm and is a neutral affirmation of a point made earlier in the discussion. It aligns with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by clarifying the definition of open-source, which can foster better comprehension among participants in the discussion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It is a constructive contribution to the dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by contributing meaningfully to the discussion about open-source models. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.