Reposted by Andrew Yang🧢⬆️🇺🇸
The statement discusses polling data and its implications for political races in Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin. It questions the accuracy of certain internal numbers and suggests adjustments to interpret the data more realistically. The tone is analytical and aims to provide a more accurate understanding of the polling situation.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is focused on analyzing polling data rather than attacking individuals or groups. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by questioning the accuracy of the data and suggesting adjustments for a more realistic interpretation. It aims to provide clarity rather than confusion. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the polling data without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on the data itself rather than the individuals who produced it. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss the accuracy of polling data, which is a relevant public issue. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.