In reply to:
Willie Agnew | wagnew@dair-community.social
@willie_agnew
·
537d
The statement by @willie_agnew constitutes public discourse as it engages with the public issue of AI Safety and technical AI governance. The tone is critical but aims to correct a perceived misunderstanding.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm and is focused on correcting a perceived error, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding by pointing out a perceived error, which aligns with promoting understanding, empathy, and compassion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing a specific point of disagreement without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement implicitly acknowledges the possibility of error by engaging in dialogue, which aligns with the principle of acknowledging and correcting mistakes. [+1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.