Ron DeSantis

The statement and the accompanying conversation constitute public discourse as they engage with a public issue, specifically the media's portrayal of a political figure's record and policy stance. The tone of the statement is critical and suggests a perceived inconsistency or bias in media coverage. The intent appears to be to highlight and criticize the media's role in shaping public perception of Vice President Kamala Harris' record on border security.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not directly cause harm but implies a negative judgment on the media's actions, which could contribute to public distrust in media institutions. This is a minor violation. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects the privacy and dignity of individuals involved, focusing on public actions and records rather than personal attacks. This is neutral.
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is primarily critical. This is a minor violation. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in criticism but does not provide constructive dialogue or specific examples to support the claim. This is a minor violation. [-1]
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses its platform to highlight a perceived issue in media coverage, which can be seen as an attempt to better society by calling for accountability. This is a minor alignment. [+1]
6. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds free speech principles but could be more responsible by providing evidence or examples to support the claim. This is neutral.