PA Department of State
@PAStateDept
·
84d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the efficiency and transparency of election processes, comparing Florida's election results reporting to Pennsylvania's. It implies that Pennsylvania's slower reporting is unnecessary and suggests that all states should be able to report results on election night.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could contribute to public distrust in Pennsylvania's election process by implying inefficiency or lack of transparency. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of Pennsylvania election officials, as it indirectly criticizes their processes without acknowledging potential valid reasons for the differences. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion towards Pennsylvania election officials or the complexities of their processes. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it makes a comparative assertion without inviting discussion or understanding of differing circumstances. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to influence public opinion on election processes, but it does so in a way that could undermine trust in Pennsylvania's election system rather than promoting constructive improvement. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.