Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement engages in a substantive discussion about AI regulation and accountability, which are significant public issues. The tone is critical but not overtly hostile, and the intent appears to be to highlight perceived inconsistencies in the AI community's stance on regulation.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it does criticize a group broadly, which could be seen as somewhat harmful.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It maintains a respectful tone. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does raise a valid point for discussion.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism but could be seen as a bit generalized. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss a public issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.