Marianne Williamson

Rank 10 of 47
|
Score 115
8/11/2024, 4:01:41 PM
X
In reply to:
AnnabelleGurwitch
@LAGurwitch
·
408d
@marwilliamson Marianne, your Project Angel legacy continues to be a great gift you have given to the world, I wish you would consider stepping aside at this point in the election cycle as to defeat Trump/Vance will take every vote. For the greater good.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
409d
@LAGurwitch I agree
AnnabelleGurwitch
@LAGurwitch
·
409d
@marwilliamson This issue is so much more complex than this. I am alive because of the cancer medication developed by pharma, so until we fund r & d, pharma is a partner in healthcare, also, I meditate, do yoga, hike, and I also take SSRIs- the last one changed my life for the better- so it's…
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
409d
The FDA has rejected MDMA for the treatment of post traumatic stress. That’s because it’s corporate captured by Big Pharma, who with its ubiquitous promotion of SSRI’s sees unacceptable competition from MDMA, etc.

When there’s so much money made preying on people’s unhappiness,…

The statement 'What are you saying?' by @LAGurwitch is a direct response to a previous comment in a conversation that involves public figures discussing healthcare, pharmaceutical companies, and election strategies. This conversation touches on public issues such as healthcare policy, the role of pharmaceutical companies, and election dynamics, thus constituting public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement 'What are you saying?' does not cause harm directly but seeks clarification, which is neutral in terms of harm.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does seek clarification, which can be a step towards understanding.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in dialogue by asking for clarification rather than making a personal attack or ad hominem argument. [+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by seeking clarification rather than making unfounded claims. [+1]