Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement and accompanying image criticize Kamala Harris for allegedly receiving significant financial support from a pro-Israel lobby while expressing concern about the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. The tone is accusatory and suggests a conflict of interest or hypocrisy. The content addresses a public issue related to political funding, foreign policy, and humanitarian concerns.
- The statement aims to hold a public figure accountable, which can be seen as striving to do no harm by promoting transparency. However, the accusatory tone may contribute to polarization and harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of Kamala Harris, as it publicly accuses her of hypocrisy without providing a nuanced discussion or evidence beyond the financial figure. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It focuses on criticism without fostering a constructive dialogue about the complexities of the issue. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in personal attacks by directly accusing Kamala Harris of being on a particular side without acknowledging potential nuances or her broader policy positions. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to raise awareness about a perceived issue of political funding and foreign policy, which can be seen as using influence for societal betterment. However, the approach is confrontational rather than constructive. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.