Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
🥥The Year of the Ravens🌴
@workerxParty
·
342d
The statement criticizes the Biden administration and Vice President Kamala Harris for their stance on a serious issue, which the author refers to as a genocide. The tone is accusatory and implies a moral failing on the part of the administration and the Vice President. The intent appears to be to hold public officials accountable for their actions or inactions regarding a significant human rights issue.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but uses strong language to criticize public figures. It could be seen as harmful if it incites undue hostility. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It focuses on public figures in their professional capacity. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding and empathy for those affected by the alleged genocide, but its accusatory tone may hinder constructive dialogue.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments but criticizes the actions and choices of public officials. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the author's influence to bring attention to a significant issue, aiming for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles and uses the platform to address a public concern responsibly, though the tone could be more measured. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.