Gary Marcus

Rank 11 of 47
|
Score 83

The statement by @immanencer constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive discussion about the legitimacy and business practices of AI startups, which is a public concern. The tone is critical and accusatory, suggesting that AI startups are engaging in unethical practices such as selling chips and repackaging copyrighted materials without proper compensation.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement could potentially cause harm by making broad accusations without specific evidence, which may unfairly damage reputations.聽[-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of others, as it makes generalized accusations against AI startups without providing specific details or evidence.聽[-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it contributes to a negative and accusatory discourse.聽[-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It makes broad accusations without offering a constructive path forward or engaging with differing viewpoints.聽[-2]