In reply to:
Keegan
@Keego1013
·
459d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
460d
The statement by @Keego1013 constitutes public discourse as it engages in a debate about child labor, a significant societal issue. The tone is confrontational and defensive, suggesting a strong disagreement with the opposing viewpoint.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm; it implies a threat ('you would have had to go through me') which can be seen as aggressive and potentially harmful. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others; it engages in a form of verbal aggression that could be interpreted as harassment. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is confrontational and dismissive of the opposing viewpoint. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it resorts to a personal attack rather than addressing the argument substantively. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not use the platform responsibly; it escalates the conflict rather than contributing to a reasoned debate. [-2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.