Gary Marcus

Rank 11 of 47
|
Score 83
8/12/2024, 5:23:49 PM
X
In reply to:
ihor gowda
@ihorgowda
·
537d
@RichardOnsare1 @GaryMarcus STFU you troll
Richard Miruka 🇰🇪✪
@RichardOnsare1
·
537d
@GaryMarcus STFU you hater
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
537d
Chance that a given person will get hit by lightning in the next year: about one in a million

Chance that the two protagonists in the Trump / Musk interview will tell the truth and nothing but the truth during their interview: zero

The statement 'Personally, I admired the cogency and sophistication of his counterargument. Compelling!' constitutes public discourse as it engages substantively with a public issue, specifically the credibility of public figures in an interview. The tone is respectful and constructive, aiming to elevate the conversation by focusing on the quality of the argument rather than engaging in personal attacks.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement strives to do no harm with words and actions by avoiding inflammatory language and focusing on the merits of the argument. [+2]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding, empathy, and compassion by appreciating the quality of the counterargument, which can foster a more respectful and thoughtful dialogue. [+2]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism and dialogue by highlighting the cogency and sophistication of the counterargument, rather than resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]