Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement engages in a substantive discussion about the implications of a legislative bill (SB-1047) on AI academia, startups, and societal risks, which constitutes public discourse. The tone is respectful and seeks to understand and clarify points made by @GaryMarcus, while also raising counterpoints for consideration.
- The statement strives to do no harm by respectfully engaging in a discussion and seeking clarity. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by appreciating the clarity in @GaryMarcus's points and raising thoughtful counterpoints. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism and dialogue without personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly and with integrity. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.