The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues related to governance, the economy, and political systems. It critiques the current state of government operations and suggests a solution, thus contributing to civic dialogue.
- The statement does not directly harm others with words or actions, but it does imply a negative view of current government officials.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does single out Kamala Harris, which could be seen as disrespectful to her dignity. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on criticism. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it makes a broad generalization and could be seen as an ad hominem attack on Kamala Harris. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to call for political change, which could be seen as an attempt to better society, but it does so in a divisive manner. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to express a political opinion, but the responsibility and integrity of the message are debatable.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.