Gary Marcus

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 83
8/13/2024, 3:38:24 AM
X
In reply to:
Olivia P. Walker
@olivia_p_walker
·
537d
@GaryMarcus All you have to do is listen to the conversation to know some of that stuff is blatantly false. It was a good conversation, you should listen to the recording:
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
537d
There is a STAGGERING difference between the reports on Trump-Musk here (enthusiastic!) and on Reddit (absolutely scathing).

Makes you wonder if people even listened to the same conversation.

(I alternately got time-outs and heard zip when I tried to tune in.)

The statement by @olivia_p_walker and the subsequent reply by another user engage in a discussion about the credibility and quality of a conversation involving public figures. The tone is critical and questioning, aiming to seek clarity and positive specifics about the conversation in question. This constitutes public discourse as it involves engagement with public issues and debates about the actions and statements of well-known individuals.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement by @olivia_p_walker and the reply do not appear to cause harm directly. However, the critical nature of the comments could be perceived as questioning the judgment of others, which might be seen as indirectly harmful if not handled constructively.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others to a reasonable extent, as it focuses on the content of the conversation rather than personal attacks. However, the broader conversation includes some derogatory comments about the individuals involved, which could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement by @olivia_p_walker and the reply aim to promote understanding by seeking clarification and positive specifics, which aligns with the principle of promoting empathy and compassion. However, the broader conversation includes negative and dismissive comments that do not promote understanding. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement and reply engage in constructive criticism by questioning the judgment and seeking specifics. However, the broader conversation includes personal attacks and ad hominem arguments, which do not align with this principle.