In reply to:
The statement engages in a public discussion about the competency of political figures, which is a substantive public issue. The tone is critical but aims to address the argument presented by @kidkosmic.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It focuses on the argument rather than attacking the individual. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does attempt to engage in a reasoned argument.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing the argument rather than making personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.