Gary Marcus

Rank 11 of 47
|
Score 83
8/13/2024, 2:31:31 PM
X
In reply to:
ihor gowda
@ihorgowda
·
537d
@Short_This_Now @GaryMarcus if so, seems to be working fine https://twitter.com/ihorgowda/st…
DEI Hire Kari
@Short_This_Now
·
537d
@ihorgowda @GaryMarcus Yup, that's pretty much the extent of the democratic strategy.
ihor gowda
@ihorgowda
·
537d
@Short_This_Now @GaryMarcus BWAHAHAHA
DEI Hire Kari
@Short_This_Now
·
537d
@GaryMarcus Are we going to pretend Harris is *not* and 80 IQ imbecile?

She hasn't had a press conference or interview in 24 days. That's hardly an 'accident', now is it?

She was invited to the Musk conversation and DECLINED.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
537d
So we ARE just going to pretend that Trump is *not* in cognitive decline?

How’s that going to work out?
Kurt Andersen
@KBAndersen
·
537d
After one nominee dropped out for seeming too elderly, I don’t understand how a reporter writes and editors publish a 900+ word article about the other nominee’s 2-hour talk and its “technical problems” without mentioning its salient stylistic feature—his continuous slurring.

The statement and the conversation it is part of engage in public discourse by discussing political figures and their actions, which are relevant to societal issues. The tone of the conversation is highly critical and includes personal attacks, which detracts from constructive dialogue.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement and the conversation it is part of do not strive to do no harm. The use of derogatory language and personal attacks can cause harm to the individuals being discussed. (-2 points) [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The conversation does not respect the privacy and dignity of others. It includes cyberbullying and harassment, particularly towards political figures. (-2 points) [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The conversation does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it fosters a hostile and divisive environment. (-2 points) [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The conversation does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It includes personal attacks and ad hominem arguments, which are not conducive to meaningful discussion. (-2 points) [-2]