Marianne Williamson

Rank 27 of 47
|
Score -6
8/13/2024, 2:33:08 PM
X
In reply to:
Joel Keith
@MayNotBeJoking
·
458d
@marwilliamson The limited capability of those bombs, as destructive as they were, left enough people alive to rebuild those cities.

That is not the story of nuclear capability today.

And there are still physical and psychological scars in those cities.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
458d
Nuclear warfare “is not as scary as people think.”
My God.
Quinn Slobodian
@zeithistoriker
·
458d
Musk: "Hiroshima and Nagasaki were bombed but now they're full cities again."
Trump: "That's great. That's great."
Musk: "Yeah so it's not as scary as people think."

The statement by @MayNotBeJoking, 'The bombs that struck Hiroshima and Nagasaki are as pin pricks compared to the nukes being built today,' constitutes public discourse as it engages with the serious issue of nuclear warfare and its implications. The tone is serious and aims to highlight the increased destructive capability of modern nuclear weapons compared to those used in World War II.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as fear-inducing. However, it aims to raise awareness about the dangers of modern nuclear weapons, which can be seen as a preventive measure against harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement aims to promote understanding of the increased dangers of modern nuclear weapons, which can foster empathy and compassion for those affected by nuclear warfare. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in a factual discussion rather than personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    By raising awareness about the dangers of modern nuclear weapons, the statement uses influence for the betterment of society. [+2]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss a significant public issue. [+2]