Gary Marcus

The statement engages in a public discourse about the perceived sexism in the way public figures are addressed. It questions whether the use of first names for female public figures, as opposed to titles for male public figures, is indicative of sexism. The statement also touches on the accessibility of research tools, which is a separate but relevant issue in public discourse.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not appear to cause harm directly but raises a concern about potential sexism, which is a valid issue to discuss.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in personal attacks or harassment. It focuses on the behavior rather than the individual. [+1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   By questioning the potential sexism, the statement promotes understanding and empathy towards the issue of gender bias. [+1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the behavior and seeking clarification, rather than making personal attacks. [+1]