Rashida Tlaib

Rank 4 of 47
|
Score 177

The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue, specifically the stance of a political figure (Donald Trump) in relation to labor unions and workers' rights. The statement is critical of Donald Trump and aligns with the United Auto Workers' (UAW) position, suggesting that Trump supports billionaires over workers.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses a derogatory term ('scab') to describe Donald Trump, which can be seen as harmful and inflammatory. This violates the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does use a pejorative term. It partially respects the privacy and dignity of others but could be more respectful. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it is accusatory and divisive. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It uses a personal attack ('scab') rather than addressing specific policies or actions in a constructive manner. [-2]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that could be considered irresponsible due to its inflammatory language. [-1]