Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement and accompanying image engage in public discourse by addressing concerns about the influence and behavior of AI companies and their leaders. The tone is cautionary and critical, aiming to raise awareness about potential risks associated with AI development and the power held by individuals in the industry.
- The statement aims to do no harm by raising awareness about potential risks, but the strong language in the image ('We should be very afraid') could incite fear rather than constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy but the image's strong language could be seen as a personal attack on Sam Altman, which may not respect his dignity. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by highlighting concerns about AI companies' behavior, but the image's fear-inducing language may undermine this effort. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of AI companies, but the image's language could be seen as a personal attack rather than a critique of actions or policies. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to raise important issues about AI oversight, contributing to the betterment of society. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.