Gary Marcus

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 83
Dan Clark
@DanClarkSports
·
539d
His ego is probably too big to realize it, but @elonmusk is actually turning swing voters away from Trump.
8/14/2024, 4:22:18 AM
X
In reply to:
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
538d
Elon is in such a bubble, he doesn’t recognize that these covers are a reflection of a reality. Crazy that the WSJ gets it, and he just doesn’t.
Elon Musk
@elonmusk
·
539d
So obvious

The statement and the associated conversation constitute public discourse as they engage in a substantive discussion about media bias, public perception, and the influence of public figures on political opinions. The tone of the conversation is critical and somewhat confrontational, focusing on the perceived disconnect between Elon Musk's views and the reality as depicted by media outlets. The images from TIME magazine covers are used to illustrate the perceived media bias and the contrasting portrayals of political figures.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement and conversation do not directly cause harm but are critical of a public figure's perception, which can be seen as a form of constructive criticism.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The conversation respects the privacy of individuals but engages in public criticism, which is a common aspect of public discourse involving well-known figures.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The conversation does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does engage in a critical analysis of media representation and public perception.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The conversation involves criticism of Elon Musk's views and actions but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on the impact of his actions on public opinion and media representation. [+1]