Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
538d
In reply to:
Steve
@Steve3449
·
538d
The statement 'That’s a diversion.' is a brief interjection in an ongoing conversation about political neutrality and public trust in social media, specifically Twitter. The tone is dismissive, suggesting that the previous comment is irrelevant or misleading. The intent appears to be to redirect the conversation back to the original topic of political neutrality and public trust.
- The statement does not cause harm directly, but its dismissive tone could be seen as unconstructive. Minor alignment. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. Alignment. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is dismissive and does not contribute constructively. Violation. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It dismisses the previous comment without providing a reasoned argument. Violation. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech but does not use the platform responsibly to further the discussion. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.