Marianne Williamson

Rank 17 of 47
|
Score 64
8/14/2024, 6:16:50 PM
X
In reply to:
Owen van der Klauw
@OwenvdKlauw
·
502d
@marwilliamson @MayNotBeJoking Of course the two men were discussing this recovery in the context of something quite different; safe nuclear power generation.
So why misrepresent it as if either of them don’t abhor nuclear weapons - which they do?
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
503d
@MayNotBeJoking The bombs that struck Hiroshima and Nagasaki are as pin pricks compared to the nukes being built today
Joel Keith
@MayNotBeJoking
·
503d
@marwilliamson The limited capability of those bombs, as destructive as they were, left enough people alive to rebuild those cities.

That is not the story of nuclear capability today.

And there are still physical and psychological scars in those cities.

The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive discussion about nuclear weapons and their impact, which is a significant public issue. The tone is apologetic and corrective, aiming to clarify a misunderstanding and acknowledge a mistake.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement strives to do no harm by acknowledging a mistake and correcting it, which helps to prevent the spread of misinformation. [+2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding, empathy, and compassion by admitting a mistake and apologizing, which fosters a respectful dialogue. [+2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism and dialogue by addressing the misunderstanding without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement acknowledges and corrects a mistake, which is a direct adherence to this principle. [+2]